Monday, January 21, 2013

A Few Thoughts on Inauguration Day...

SEATTLE, WASH. -- Just over four years ago, I had barely begun my service in the United States Senate. My boss at the time was the top Republican on the Senate Rules Committee, the committee that oversees all inauguration events. So, much to my delight, I was incredibly pleased to receive seated tickets to the historic inauguration of President Obama. One for me, and enough for everyone in my family who wanted to come. So, my parents flew to town, and both of my sisters came too.

It was an exciting time. Whether you were Republican or Democrat, you couldn't help but feel at least a tinge of excitement that history was in the making and we were lucky enough to watch it firsthand. There was such great exhilaration in the air that frigid morning, that I made this little video to try to capture the essence of it... 


While the results of the last four years, in my conservative eyes, may have been underwhelming at best, it was still neat to watch our President be sworn into office during that historic day four years ago. I will always remember the energy there, how much I shivered, and our attempts at maneuvering through the biggest crowd I have ever seen.

Like many of you, I would have liked (loved) to have seen another candidate being sworn in today. But that's how things go... Sometimes you win, sometimes you don't. And life goes on all the same.

One of the things that really irked me during this presidential campaign though, was the nastiness/ignorance I saw on display on social media... blogs, Twitter, Facebook in particular. People declared such ridiculous things, like "He hates our country!" and "He wants our country to fail!" WHAT?! Are you serious? So absurd! While I appreciated the fact that people actually wanted to be involved in politics (because, let's be honest, how often does that happen?), and cared enough about what was happening in our country to want to have a voice, it made me want to tune out the campaigns entirely. I quickly got disgusted with the entire thing and couldn't wait for it to all be over.

While our President's ideas over his last term of how to solve our country's problems are far from how you or I might go about solving them, (and quite frankly he has done an incredibly poor job at reviving our economy, and his ideas (or lack of them) of how to drive down our country's ballooning debt are weak (I could go on...)), but it doesn't mean he doesn't love our country because of it. The man, along with any other politician who gets brutally ridiculed, has dedicated his life to serving our country. I'm pretty sure patriotism is deeply rooted at anyone's core if they go so far as to run for any kind of public office at all. It has to be.

A wise U.S. Senator once said, "There are problems where government is the solution. But not always. There are some problems where free markets is the solution. But not always. But let us understand in the debate, that as we go back and forth between these two concepts, that we do not question the motives or the patriotism of anyone on the other side."

Those words have stuck with me over the years. So, let's hope these next four years are filled with respect, peace, kind words of encouragement, prayer, and solutions that help put our country in the right direction. We're all Americans, after all. Happy Inauguration Day!

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Washington vs. Washington

SEATTLE, WASH. -- It's not a secret. I'm not really a football fan. I'm not not a fan. I just don't follow any particular NFL team. My dad and brother were always watching the 49ers growing up, so I guess that's as much as I can claim. If anyone ever asks though, I say I'm rooting for the niners. But you know... not really, since I have no idea when I last watched them play.

Today though, there is a big game currently being played between my old stomping grounds, the Washington Redskins, and my current place of residency, the Seattle Seahawks. A friend passed along this article from the Washington Post about today's rivalry, and I have to admit I laughed most of the way through it... even though I don't agree with every fact it claims. And I'd like to take a few moments to set some of those things straight.

1. "That Washington [Seattle] is renowned for its mellow niceness, even on the roads." 

NOT TRUE. Completely 100% false. I discover this daily as I try to merge lanes to get on the freeway. Some days I have to stick my head out the window and wave my hands like a crazy person to get anyone to notice that there is a car in the lane next to them who would really like to merge. UGH. Bugs me every day.

As for the rest of their "niceness," this is probably one of the most unfriendly places I've ever lived. People in my complex will dodge the elevator completely and walk up several flights of stairs if they see someone else waiting for the elevator. People go out of their way (so out of their way, that it's ridiculously stupid) to not bump into someone else within a few yards radius. Isaac kindly point this out to me when I first moved here. Even he has fallen in line with this trend and goes out of his way to not share an elevator. So stupid.

2.  "The cities are also a continent apart in terms of political intensity. Here, politics and government are the local industry, of course. There, they are an afterthought. Four years ago, the Seattle-Tacoma area posted Nielsen’s lowest ratings for the presidential inauguration. Last week, when this Washington was fixated on the “fiscal cliff,” that Washington wasn’t. “Nobody was talking about it at all,” Vail said.'"  

Yes, the cities are vastly different in their political intensity. Just about every conversation in D.C. with anyone ever is centered on politics. For the most part I have enjoyed not having politics be the center of everyone's conversation, BUT last week... WHOA, watch out. They were definitely fixated on the fiscal cliff as much as the next guy. Even the blue collar dudes I work with had a thing or two to say about taking a fiscal free fall. They were upset, outraged and I even heard a few plans come out of their mouths on how to save tax dollars. Most wanted to blame the Republicans, especially Speaker Boehner -- don't worry, I tried my darndest to set them straight. It's hard to do around here.

3. And lastly... "The Seahawks have a passionate following, and ­CenturyLink Field is known as a raucous stadium. But residents say the NFL, or any professional sport, doesn’t dominate the way it does in this Washington, where thousands of burgundy-and-gold banners fly in neighborhoods rich and poor and from car windows old and new...  One common explanation of Redskins mania is that not much else pulls together the fractious capital, with a history of racial divisiveness, a reputation for transience and a culture of political blood sport... Seattle, meanwhile, has a life beyond football that includes the great outdoors, Microsoft and microbrews."

Maybe my head was stuck in a political bubble whilst living in our nation's capital for the last several years, but I can't recall ever feeling like I was in Redskins nation. Maybe my D.C. friends can attest otherwise. But, during the few short months I've lived in Seattle, I've noticed a much stronger following and deeper passion for the Hawks. It comes up in conversation at work as much as politics did in D.C. Jersey's are sported everywhere I turn and they talk to you about "last night's game" as if there were no question that you watched it. In fact, on Friday the city hoisted it's beloved 12th man flag over the Space Needle. Do they do that anywhere in D.C. for the Redskins? Not anywhere apparent to me. I guess the Redskins love just wasn't as obvious. I feel like if the love is strong, it's obvious. But in the Evergreen state, you know where your allegiances must lie.

Alright, that's all I've got. I definitely have other observations, but I'll do us all a favor and keep those to myself.  In case you're wondering which Washington I think is better, well... I only like the one I currently live in best because a certain someone is here...

Here's the rest of the article if you care to indulge...  happy game day!:

Two Washingtons, but ours is better than theirs

By Published: January 4

Okay, their spire is taller than our spire. But ours is marble.

So what if Seattle’s Space Needle has a few feet on the Washington Monument (605 and 555, respectively). Our Capitol Hill (seat of democracy, beacon of freedom to the world) is more famous than their Capitol Hill (probably a very nice residential neighborhood).

Their traffic is getting worse faster than ours. They have more tech jobs, but we read more books (at least, we order more from Amazon).

Our dazzling star rookie quarterback has better hair than their dazzling star rookie quarterback.
Sunday’s wild card game is not just Redskins vs. Seahawks, of course. It’s city vs. city. And in this case, it’s Washington vs. Washington (the other one).

“No, the other Washington is Washington, D.C.,” insisted Josephine Eckert, president of the local Washington State Society, a group for Evergreen State expatriates who live in the nation’s capital.
“When we say Washingtonians, we mean people from Washington state.”

Oh, they do, do they?

Well, in advance of the sudden-death match that will send only one city’s team on in the playoffs, let us compare and contrast the real Washington . . . and that other one.

According to stats, quality-of-life rankings and people who have lived in both cities, they are very different places. One is a Starbucks-swilling, bicycle-crazy, Amazon-obsessed metropolis with loosening marijuana laws. The other is Seattle.

In stereotypeology, Washington West is flannel-wear, overcast skies and laid-back vibes. Washington East is button-down shirts, sizzling summers and résumé pride. True?

“It’s true that Washington, D.C., is a place where your job is everything,” said journalist Michael Kinsley, who decamped to Seattle in 1996 to start the online magazine Slate (which is now owned by The Washington Post). He returned last year to a Dupont Circle rowhouse to be editor at large at the New Republic. He found, in the Washington that produced Microsoft, Amazon and Costco, that entrepreneurialism was king.

“Everybody’s got the bug,” Kinsley said. “There’s much less emphasis on what you do. If you just say you’re raising money for a small start-up, that’s enough.”

We’re a bit bigger, with about 618,000 Washingtonians to Seattle’s 609,000. And a lot richer; seven of the nation’s 10 highest-income counties are in the Washington, D.C., area, while Seattle’s King County comes in 86th. But who’s smarter? Seattle wins if you count college degrees within the city limits. But the brainy D.C. suburbs make us the nation’s best-educated metropolitan region, census data reveal.

In fact, on many city rankings (often a scientifically dubious exercise), the two Washingtons have very similar profiles. We are the 43rd most livable city in the world, according the 2012 Mercer survey, and Seattle is the 44th. They rank sixth for walkable neighborhoods; the District is seventh. On the Sperling “manliness” index (with criteria including popularity of power tools and frequency of monster truck rallies), they outman us by five spots (40th vs. 45th; Nashville is No. 1, yet the Titans finished 6-10).

We’re more congested, both on the roads (Washingtonians waste an average of 45 hours in traffic each year, Seattle-ites just 33) and in our sinuses (the District ranks 82nd on the worst allergies list, to Seattle’s 91st).

But, boy, do we top them on violent crime (the District posts 21.9 murders per 100,000 residents, Seattle just 3.1).

But the biggest difference, according to people with feet in both Washingtons, is attitudinal.

Rep. Jim McDermott (D), who has represented his Seattle district in Congress since 1989, says his weekend Washington is much more relaxed than his Monday-Thursday Washington. Coats and business attire are still required in far too many D.C. settings, he said. And people charge from meeting to meeting “like they are running with the bulls,” often against the crossing light.

“People run out into traffic here like they are in a competitive sport,” said McDermott, who walks to the Capitol from an apartment on Eighth Street SE. “In Seattle, people wait for the light to change, and nobody thinks that’s strange.”

That Washington is renowned for its mellow niceness, even on the roads. Drivers are known to come to a stop if an oncoming car wants to turn left in front of them. There are times at four-way stops when nobody goes first.

“Everyone is waving at somebody else to go ahead,” said Janet Vail, a 35-year Seattle resident who went to Georgetown University and makes frequent business trips to the District. “It can take forever; nobody honks.”

In this Washington, they have been known to honk.

“Driving there, I felt like the king of road,” reported the Atlantic’s Jim Fallows, a decades-long D.C. resident who spent two years in Seattle working on special projects for Microsoft. “You feel like a New Yorker in Kansas.”

Some impatient, hard-charging East Coasters characterize Seattle’s courteous, deferential style as the “unbearable politeness of being.” Joan Haffey worked for the D.C. branch of a Seattle-based company for more than a decade. She adored her West Coast colleagues but remembers being caught more than once making snarky comments during conference calls with the home office.

“They would never, ever do that,” she said. “Unless they were better at using the mute button.”

The cities are also a continent apart in terms of political intensity. Here, politics and government are the local industry, of course. There, they are an afterthought. Four years ago, the Seattle-Tacoma area posted Nielsen’s lowest ratings for the presidential inauguration. Last week, when this Washington was fixated on the “fiscal cliff,” that Washington wasn’t.

“Nobody was talking about it at all,” Vail said. “The powder, that’s what people were talking about. We’ve had some great snow.”

Nothing may draw a bigger distinction in the two cities than the role of their respective football teams.

The Seahawks have a passionate following, and ­CenturyLink Field is known as a raucous stadium. But residents say the NFL, or any professional sport, doesn’t dominate the way it does in this Washington, where thousands of burgundy-and-gold banners fly in neighborhoods rich and poor and from car windows old and new.

One common explanation of Redskins mania is that not much else pulls together the fractious capital, with a history of racial divisiveness, a reputation for transience and a culture of political blood sport.

“In many ways, D.C. has only the Redskins as an even faintly unifying theme across race and class and political outlook” and the region’s sprawling geography, said Fallows, who was on vacation in the South Pacific last weekend during the showdown game with Dallas and had to huddle with his two sons around a laptop with a sketchy dial-up Internet connection to follow the action.

Seattle, meanwhile, has a life beyond football that includes the great outdoors, Microsoft and microbrews.

“If you ask someone in Seattle to list their sources of civic pride, the Seahawks might make the top 20,” Fallows said. “In Washington, the Redskins will almost always make the top two or three.”

Still, the other Washingtonians plan to make their presence known Sunday. Many of those not watching at Penn Quarter (a noted Seahawks bar) will be at FedEx Field. Nate Potter, who grew up on Mercer Island next to Seattle and now lives on 14th Street NW, has his ticket.

“We plan on being loud, proud and present on Sunday,” said Potter, who works as a governmental affairs consultant. “Okay, polite and generally respectful, too. It is in our blood.”

The Democratic mayors of the two cities have a wager on Sunday’s game: The loser will fly the winner’s flag over city hall for a day.

Has D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray ever visited Seattle? “I’ll have to check,” said his spokesman Pedro Ribeiro. “I know he’s been to Portland.”

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Farewell 2012!

SEATTLE, WASH. -- It hardly seems right that one of the best years came to an end so quickly. I wish we could just make time stand still sometimes. Ohhhh, wouldn't that be so nice?!

As I bid farewell to 2012 and usher in 2013 with excitement for what lies ahead, I do so with a tinge of sadness. Because, oh my goodness, it was a really good year (not politically speaking). I am grateful for the wonderful memories I made with loyal friends, terrific coworkers, my loving family, and tremendous new in-laws who welcomed me with open arms to their family. 2012 brought an abundant amount of love into my life, a big move across the country, and a handsome husband who I cherish every day.

The emotions in this photo sum up the year quite nicely:

One of my favorite photos of our wedding day. Mostly because Isaac cracks me up with his huge-o smile and outstretched arm. I love it. 
As is customary at the end/beginning of every year, I put together a little video of the Candrian's year... So, here it is... our adieu to 2012... Go ahead. Watch it. You might see a few familiar faces:


We send all our warmest wishes to you for a wonderful, happy and adventurous 2013.  I'll try to be a better blogger to keep you updated on all the twists and turns of 2013! There will be many, I am certain. Happy New Year to you all!   Thank you for being part of my life.